Back to Blog
Mad Sad Glad Retrospective: Questions, Agenda, and Example
Retrospective Activities & Games

Mad Sad Glad Retrospective: Questions, Agenda, and Example

SprintsPlans TeamJuly 20, 2026

Mad Sad Glad Retrospective: Questions, Agenda, and Example

Introduction

A retrospective format should make reflection easier, not distract the team with decoration. Process-focused retrospectives can miss the human impact of work.

This guide explains the approach in practical terms: what it is, why it is useful, when to use it, how to apply it step by step, and which mistakes to avoid.

What is it?

Mad Sad Glad is a retrospective activity that asks participants to sort experiences into three emotional categories. Mad captures frustration or anger, Sad captures disappointment or loss, and Glad captures satisfaction, pride, or gratitude.

Why is it useful?

Process-focused retrospectives can miss the human impact of work. Emotions often reveal unresolved conflict, loss of trust, overload, or positive practices worth protecting. The format gives those signals a legitimate place without turning the meeting into unstructured venting.

Benefits

  • Surfaces emotional patterns that operational metrics cannot show.
  • Helps teams discuss morale and relationships with shared language.
  • Balances difficult feedback with positive experiences.
  • Can reveal the impact of organizational change, incidents, or pressure.

When should you use it?

Use Mad Sad Glad after a demanding sprint, reorganization, major incident, deadline, team change, or period of conflict. Do not use it as a substitute for professional support when serious wellbeing concerns are present.

How to do it

  1. Set a respectful frame. Explain that participants should describe work experiences and impact without attacking individuals.
  2. Write privately. Give everyone time to add cards to Mad, Sad, and Glad. Anonymous input can reduce social risk.
  3. Read and group. Cluster similar emotions and ask clarifying questions without debating whether a feeling is valid.
  4. Identify underlying needs. Ask what condition, expectation, or unmet need is behind the emotional signal.
  5. Vote on themes. Prioritize the themes that most affect the team's ability to work safely and effectively.
  6. Agree on a response. Choose a practical action, support request, or working agreement and define when it will be reviewed.

Real example

After a difficult release, a team listed frustration about last-minute scope, sadness that planned quality work was dropped, and pride in how support and engineering collaborated during launch. The discussion showed that the deepest issue was not overtime alone; it was the absence of a clear scope-freeze decision. The team created a launch change policy and preserved the cross-functional support channel that had worked well.

Common mistakes

  • Allowing cards to name and attack individuals.
  • Trying to solve every emotional issue immediately.
  • Dismissing feelings because the project outcome was successful.
  • Ending after sharing without defining support or improvement.

FAQ

Is Mad Sad Glad too personal for work?

It can be appropriate when the scope is work-related and the facilitator creates clear boundaries. Participation in personal disclosure should not be forced.

Should the facilitator ask who wrote each card?

No, especially when anonymous input is enabled. Focus on understanding the pattern and its impact.

Can the categories be renamed?

Yes. Some teams use Frustrated, Disappointed, and Energized to fit their culture.

Conclusion

Mad Sad Glad helps teams treat emotions as useful information about the work system. Facilitate carefully, avoid blame, and translate the most important signal into a concrete change or support action.

Call To Action

Use SprintsPlans to collect Mad, Sad, and Glad cards anonymously, vote on the most important theme, and record the team's response as an action item.

Related posts